This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: The legal question is did Ohios criminal syndicalism law violate Brandenburgs freedom of speech rights. The decision was reversed. The court decided that Brandenburg freedom of speech rights was violated. The Ohio law was deemed unconstitutional because it did not take into account whether the speech in question was to lead to imminent action. The court decided that speech must present a clear and present danger. Notes: This threats were made under the heading or revengcy. Does not meet the clear and present danger. May meet the bad tendency test....
View Full Document
- Spring '10