PLS 460 Cox Broadcasting Corporation v Cohn

PLS 460 Cox Broadcasting Corporation v Cohn - be restricted...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Cox Broadcasting Corporation v Cohn Facts of the Case: Martin Cohn was the father of a seventeen-year old girl who was raped and killed in Georgia. After obtaining information from the public record, a television station broadcast the name of Cohn's daughter in connection with the incident. This violated a Georgia privacy statute which prevented members of the media from publicizing the names or identities of rape victims. Question: Did the Georgia law violate the freedom of the press as protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments? Conclusion: The Court held that the Georgia statute violated the Constitution. Justice White recognized the primacy of issues of privacy and press freedom, but he also identified compelling reasons why the press should not
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: be restricted in this case. First, the news media is an important resource for citizens which allows them to scrutinize government proceedings. The commissions and adjudication of crimes are issues relevant to the public interest. Second, in the development of the privacy right, the Court has held that the interests of privacy "fade" in cases where controversial "information already appears on the public record." Restricting the media as the Georgia law did was a dangerous encroachment on press freedom, argued White, as it "would invite timidity and self-censorship." Decisions Decision: 8 votes for Cox Broadcasting Corporation, 0 vote(s) against Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/04/2010 for the course PLS 460 taught by Professor Lermack during the Spring '10 term at Bradley.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online