This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: the school board and members, but the court of appeals reversed and remanded for trial. On further review, the Supreme Court affirmed, but issued no opinion of the Court, basing its judgment on there being a genuine issue as to the reasons for the removal of the books. In a plurality opinion, three justices were of the opinion that students had a First Amendment right to receive ideas and information as a necessary predicate to their meaningful exercise of the rights of speech, press, and political freedom. Another justice concurring in the judgment wrote that the state had no authority to deny access to ideas for political reasons, while a fifth justice concurring in the judgment did not want to reach the First Amendment question on an incomplete record. OUTCOME: The judgment of the court of appeals was affirmed....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 05/04/2010 for the course PLS 460 taught by Professor Lermack during the Spring '10 term at Bradley.
- Spring '10