Business Law Case 7

Business Law Case 7 - Banyei Isoh William H Proctor Chaiken...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Banyei Isoh William H. Proctor 10/31/09 Chaiken V. Employment Security Commission Superior Court of Deleware, 1971 274 A.2d 707 Facts: Chaiken entered into a partnership agreement with two other individuals by the names of Strazella and Spitzer to operate a barbershop. Under the agreement, Chaiken would be in charge of the barber chairs, supplies, and licenses while the other two would be in charge of providing tools they would use. The agreement stated that Chaiken would be the partner who would decide all matters of partnership policy. As part of the portion of the agreement that included how many hours would be worked, holidays, and required Chaiken to distribute receipts. The Delaware Employment Security Commission had determined that this was not a partnership, but instead that Strazella and Spitzer worked for Chaiken. The commission brought an action to assess unemployment compensation contributions against Chaiken for the Strazella and Spitzer.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/06/2010 for the course BUAD Buad 381 taught by Professor Proctor during the Spring '10 term at Morgan.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online