BA621-L4A3 - February 1 2010 BA621 Business Law Lesson#4...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
February 1, 2010 – May 21, 2010 BA621 Business Law Lesson #4 Assignment #3 Case 10-2 Summary: The Private Movie Company, Inc. v. Pamela Lee Anderson et al. This case (pages 269-270 of your text) focused on whether an agreement had been reached between The Private Movie Company and Pamela Lee Anderson for her to star in a movie called, "Hello, She Lied." At issue was whether a deal had been made, when the parties allegedly had not agreed on certain contract provisions related to nudity and the sexual content of the script. The court looked at issues related to oral and written contracts, especially the consent of the parties. The court said that consent must be mutual. A change in terms of the offer means a rejection of the offer. Also at issue was whether Anderson’s agent/manager could bargain for her. The court ruled in Pamela Lee Anderson’s favor by deciding that The Private Movie Company did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Anderson entered into an oral or written agreement to perform in the movie. As business managers, it is imperative that you demand clear definitions in the contracts
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/06/2010 for the course BA LMA01 taught by Professor Weinstein during the Spring '10 term at Antelope Valley College.

Page1 / 2

BA621-L4A3 - February 1 2010 BA621 Business Law Lesson#4...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online