facial_expression - In Dalgleish, T., & Power, M. (1999)....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
In Dalgleish, T., & Power, M. (1999). Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. New York: John Chapter 16 Facial Expressions Paul Ekman University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA INTRODUCTION The argument about whether facial expressions of emotion are universal or culture-specific goes back more than 100 years. For most of that time the evidence was sparse, but in the last 30 years there have been many research studies. That has not served to convince everyone, but it has sharpened the argument. I will review the different kinds of evidence that support universals in expression and cultural differences. I will present eight challenges to that evidence, and how those challenges have been met by proponents of universality. I conducted some of this research and have been active in answering the challenges, so I am not a disinterested commentator, but probably no-one is. I will try to present the evidence and counter-arguments as fairly as I can, so that readers can make up their own minds. Most of the research on universals in facial expression of emotion has focused on one method—showing pictures of facial expressions to observers in different cultures, who are asked to judge what emotion is shown. If the observers in the different cultures label the expressions with the same term, it has been interpreted as evidence of universality. Most of the challenges have been against this type of evidence, arguing that the lack of total agreement is evidence of cultural difference. There have been other types of studies relevant to universals, studies in which facial behavior itself is measured. This too has been challenged. Near the end of this chapter I will more briefly summarize still other research relevant to universals, evidence which heretofore has not been brought to bear: studies of other animals, studies of the relationship between expression and physiology, studies of the relationship between expression and self-report, and conditioning studies. In the conclusion I will describe my reading of all the evidence, delineating where there are universals and the many aspects of facial expressions which differ within and between cultures. THE EVIDENCE 1. Evidence from Darwin’s Study It begins with Charles Darwin’s The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (1872/1998). His evidence for universality was the answers to 16 questions he sent to Englishmen living or traveling in eight parts of the world: Africa, America, Australia, Borneo, China, India, Malaysia and New Zealand. Even by today’s standard, that is a very good, diverse,
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
sample. They wrote that they saw the same expressions of emotion in these foreign lands as they had known in England, leading Darwin to say: “It follows, from the information thus acquired, that the same state of mind is expressed throughout the world with remarkable uniformity . . .” There are three problems that make Darwin’s evidence on universality unacceptable by today’s scientific standards. First, Darwin did not ask a sufficient number of people in each
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/12/2010 for the course PSYCHOLOGY clinical p taught by Professor Assistant during the Spring '10 term at École Normale Supérieure.

Page1 / 17

facial_expression - In Dalgleish, T., & Power, M. (1999)....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online