2nd half styles book

2nd half styles book - T NEW TEXTBOOK NEW TEXTBOOK...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 66-A 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 91 T: NEW TEXTBOOK NEW TEXTBOOK HUMANITIES 2220 S1 VENDOR: VALENCIA AUTHOR: STYLES NT: Democracy's Harshest Critic--Plato Plato is the single most influential critic of democracy in the history of the West. The philosopher lived in Athens in the fourth century B.C., during which time he saw his teacher and idol Socrates put to death by a democratic court. Much of Plato's writing can be seen as a response to the anger and despair aroused by that event. The Republic is the summation of Plato's political philosophy, a massive dialogue in which Socrates and his friends outline a blueprint for the perfect society. The criticisms that Plato put into Socrates' mouth have dominated western thinking on democracy ever since. They have helped shape modern democracy, but they have also helped shape Hitler's fascist state and the communism of the Soviet Union. Plato, it seems, has a lot to answer for. Plato's first and most lasting criticism is beguilingly simple, yet its effect on modern democracy is devastating. The argument is most seductively put in a series of dialogues between Socrates and the citizens he meets. "If you want advice on how to make shoes," asks Socrates, "whom would you ask for that advice?" "A shoemaker," comes the response. The stakes gradually rise: "If you want advice on who is good at playing music," continues Socrates, "would you ask someone who is an expert at playing musical instruments?" "Of course," the interlocutor agrees. "If you want to know who is good at math, you would ask a mathematician?" "Certainly." And so on, until the crunch questions: "If you want advice about politics, would you ask a shoemaker or a musician, or would you ask an expert on politics? Backed into this corner, the interlocutor finally agrees that in each field there is an expert who is best. Who, then, is the expert in politics? Surely not the shoemakers or the others who make up the populace. The implications of this argument for democracy are ruthlessly explored in the Republic. In the ideal state, Plato says, the ruling class will be the philosopher-kings, men especially selected and trained for the business of government. It is to them, he says, that ruling should be entrusted. (Woman may —theoretically, at least—be included.) The military class will be those men best fitted and trained for protecting the state. The others—the workers, the producers, the ordinary men and women—will live happily in the perfect and stable city, enchanted by the noble lie, the myths circulated by the philosopher- kings that offer justification for why the state is as it is. Plato's first criticism, then, is that experts should judge in their sphere of
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/12/2010 for the course HUM 2220 taught by Professor Ryals during the Spring '09 term at Valencia.

Page1 / 54

2nd half styles book - T NEW TEXTBOOK NEW TEXTBOOK...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online