HW1sol - Question 2 The proceeding simulations compares the...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Question 2 The proceeding simulations compares the effects of the proportional and integral gains on the closed-loop dynamic behavior of the car cruise control system. 5 10 15 20 25 30 19.6 19.7 19.8 19.9 20 20.1 20.2 20.3 Time (s) Velocity (m/s) k p = .5, k I = .1 k p = .8, k I = .1 k p = .5, k I = .3 v des Figure 1: A comparison of car velocity given different proportional (P) and integral (I) gains: the original system, k P = . 5 , k I = . 1 (solid), higher P gain, k P = . 8 , k I = . 1 (dash), and higher I gain k P = . 5 , k I = . 3 (dot-dash). 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 Time (s) Throttle kp = .5, kI = .1 kp = .8, kI = .1 kp = .5, kI = .3 Figure 2: A comparison of controlled throttle input given different proportional (P) and integral (I) gains: the original system, k P = . 5 , k I = . 1 (solid), higher P gain, k P = . 8 , k I = . 1 (dash), and higher I gain k P = . 5 , k I = . 3 (dot-dash)....
View Full Document

Page1 / 5

HW1sol - Question 2 The proceeding simulations compares the...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online