Intro Cost – Suppl. Note re Cost Structure, Op Leverage, and Indifference Points
Cost Structure and Profit Stability
Which cost structure is more stable or more profitable?
A higher proportion of variable
costs or a higher proportion of fixed costs?
Refer to example on p. 237238
A higher proportion of fixed costs implies a lower proportion of variable costs and hence
higher CM and CM ratio.
When sales are good, profits will increase faster with a
higher CM ratio and higher fixed costs relative to variable costs.
However, in
a
downturn, variable costs can be shut off whereas fixed costs cannot.
Therefore
a higher
proportion of fixed costs will lead to higher financial risk.
As a result, if sales volumes
are widely variable from year to year, a lower CM ratio and a higher proportion of
variable costs would lead to lower losses in bad years.
Hence,
there is a trade off here
between profitability and risk
and each business has to look at its own future sales
prospects to determine which cost structure is best.
Operating Leverage
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
This is the end of the preview.
Sign up
to
access the rest of the document.
 Spring '09
 LYZ
 Financial Accounting, higher proportion, CM Op Inc

Click to edit the document details