511-Midterm-2004F - , if lim x t = x * then f ( x * ) lim...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Economics 511 Professor John H. Nachbar Fall 2004 Midterm You have one and a half hours. Write your answers clearly, with good penmanship and good syntax. A “correct” but unintelligible answer is a wrong answer. 1. Prove the following. Theorem. Let ( X,d ) be a metric space. For any x X and any ε > 0 , N ε ( x ) is open. 2. Prove the following. Theorem. The series x i is convergent iff for every ε > 0 , there is a number T such that, for all t > s > T , ± ± ± ± ± ± t X i = s +1 x i ± ± ± ± ± ± < ε. 3. Prove the following. Theorem. Let ( X,d x ) and ( Y,d Y ) be metric spaces. Let f : X Y be continuous. For any compact set A X , f ( A ) is compact. 4. Prove the following. Theorem. Let X and Y be vector spaces. Let L : X Y be linear. Then L ( X ) is a vector subspace of Y . 5. Consider a function f : R n R . Say that f is lower semicontinuous iff for any y R , { x R n : f ( x ) y } is closed. (a) Show, using the definition, that the function f : R R defined by f ( x ) = ( 1 if x 0 , 0 otherwise , is not lower semicontinuous.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
(b) Prove that f : R n R is lower semicontinuous iff for any x * R n and any sequence { x t }
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: , if lim x t = x * then f ( x * ) lim inf f ( x t ) . Note also that one possible sequence of x t is x t = x * for all t . Informally, a function is lower semicontinuous i the function only jumps down, if it jumps at all. 1 (c) The epigraph of a function f : R n R is the set { ( x,y ) R n +1 : y f ( x ) } . Informally, the epigraph of f is the set of points lying on or above the graph of f . Prove that f is lower semicontinuous i the epigraph of f is closed. 1 In case youve forgotten the denition of lim inf: let { x t } be a sequence in R n and let E R {- , } be the set of subsequential limits of { x t } . Then lim inf x t = inf E . One can show (the proof is not dicult but I do not require you to provide it) that there is a subsequence { x t k } such that lim x t k = lim inf x t ....
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

511-Midterm-2004F - , if lim x t = x * then f ( x * ) lim...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online