40_Quick_Refresher

40_Quick_Refresher - J ournal of Economic Literature Vol....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Journal of Economic Literature Vol. XXVIII (December 1990), pp. 1645-1 660 A Quick Refresher Course Macroeconomics BY N. GREGORY MANKIW Harvard University and NBER This paper, though new, draws heavily on my previous paper, "Recent Developments in Macroeconomics: A Very Quick Refresher Course," Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, August 1988, Part 2. I am grateful to Moses Abramovitz, David Laidler, and Thomas Mayer for comments, and to the National Science Foundation for jinancial support. Introduction WENTY YEARS AGO, it was easier being a student of macroeconomics. Mac- roeconomists felt more sure of the an- swers they gave to questions such as, "What causes output and employment to fluctuate?" and "How should policy re- spond to these fluctuations?" At the textbook level, the accepted model of the economy was the IS-LM model. It was little changed from John Hicks' (1937) interpretation of John May- nard Keynes' (1936) once revolutionary vision of the economy. Because the IS- LM model took the price level as given, a Phillips curve of some sort was ap- pended to explain the adjustment of prices. Some thought the Phillips curve had the natural rate property, implying that the economy was self-correcting in the long run. At the more applied level, this consen- sus was embodied in the large-scale macroeconometric models, such as the MIT-Penn-Social Science Research Council (MPS) model. The job of refining these models generated many disserta- tions. Private and public decision makers confidently used the models to forecast important economic time series and to evaluate the effects of alternative macro- economic policies. Today, macroeconomists are much less sure of their answers. The IS-LM model rarely finds its way into scholarly jour- nals; some economists view the model as a relic of a bygone age and no longer bother to teach it. The large-scale mac- roeconometric models are mentioned only occasionally at academic confer- ences, often with derision. A graduate student today is unlikely to devote his dissertation to improving some small sec- tor of the MPS model. In contrast to this radical change in the way academic macroeconomists view their field of study, applied macroecd- nomists have not substantially changed the way they analyze the economy. The IS-LM model, augmented by the Phillips curve, continues to provide the best way 1645
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
1646 Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXVZZZ (December 1990) to interpret discussions of economic pol- icy in the press and among policy makers. Economists in business and government continue to use the large-scale macro- econometric models for forecasting and policy analysis. The theoretical develop- ments of the past twenty years have had relatively little impact on applied macroeconomics. Why is there such a great disparity be- tween academic and applied macroeco- nomics? The view of some academics is that practitioners have simply fallen be- hind the state of the art, that they con- tinue to use obsolete models because they have not kept up with the quickly advancing field. Yet this self-serving view
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 21

40_Quick_Refresher - J ournal of Economic Literature Vol....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online