This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Ordinary least squares (OLS) Interpretation and R 2 Econ 281  Chapter 1 Review  Simple Regression Analysis Richard Walker Northwestern University January 11, 2010 Econ 281  Chapter 1 Richard Walker Ordinary least squares (OLS) Interpretation and R 2 1 Ordinary least squares (OLS) Simple linear model Least squares regression 2 Interpretation and R 2 Interpretation of results Goodness of fit: R 2 Econ 281  Chapter 1 Richard Walker Ordinary least squares (OLS) Interpretation and R 2 1 Ordinary least squares (OLS) Simple linear model Least squares regression 2 Interpretation and R 2 Interpretation of results Goodness of fit: R 2 Econ 281  Chapter 1 Richard Walker Ordinary least squares (OLS) Interpretation and R 2 Simple linear model 1 Ordinary least squares (OLS) Simple linear model Least squares regression 2 Interpretation and R 2 Interpretation of results Goodness of fit: R 2 Econ 281  Chapter 1 Richard Walker Ordinary least squares (OLS) Interpretation and R 2 Simple linear model We want to start looking for relationships between economic variables We’re going to start with the most straightforward possible such relationship one dependent variable Y that we are trying to explain one explanatory variable X that might help us explain Y any relationship between X and Y is assumed a priori to be linear This is known as ‘simple linear regression’ ‘simple’ because there’s only one explanatory variable X Econ 281  Chapter 1 Richard Walker Ordinary least squares (OLS) Interpretation and R 2 Simple linear model We will assume that the following is the ‘true’ process by which the dependent variable Y is generated: Y i = β 1 + β 2 X i + u i (1.1) β 1 and β 2 are parameters that we would like to estimate u is a disturbance term The i subscript refers to the particular observation of the variables for example, if we are examining the relationship between height and wages across people, then the i would refer to the people we only actually ‘observe’ the Y i and X i , not the u i Econ 281  Chapter 1 Richard Walker Ordinary least squares (OLS) Interpretation and R 2 Simple linear model Y X β 1 Y = β 1 + β 2 X u i The true, datagenerating model Econ 281  Chapter 1 Richard Walker Ordinary least squares (OLS) Interpretation and R 2 Simple linear model Why is there a disturbance term? Why isn’t the relationship between Y and X ‘exact’? Omitted variables : something else also helps explain Y Aggregation : often the relationship is an aggregate one e.g. addingup lots of little consumption functions ⇒ aggregate consumption function unlikely to be exact Model misspecification : Y might depend on yesterday’s X , or the expectation of tomorrow’s X , rather than X itself relationship between Y and X will be close, but not exact Functional misspecification : maybe the relationship is nonlinear?...
View
Full Document
 Spring '10
 DOHERTY
 Regression Analysis, Ordinary least squares, Richard Walker

Click to edit the document details