Of co ourse this condition is always sa c s atisfied

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: em the is no unique "correct" output m s ere mix. 230 _ _ _ _ We c determine the outp levels x0, x1, x2, an x3 in proportion to o another can put nd one r, but w cannot fix their abs we f solute levels unless ad s dditional res strictions ar imposed re on th model. We will see that this is much less useful (no really very useful at he W e s s ot y all!) t than our res sults from t open model since we cannot invert the t the technology matrix in the clo osed model. odel A Nu umerical E Example The Closed Mo Supp pose that we have the same exam w mple as we solved in t open m e the model above e, but w convert the primary input into "just another industry" and appro we y " oach the problem as a closed input output m model. all s e efficient ma atrix for the open mode is as el Reca that we said that the input co-e follow ws: and i we denote by a0j the dollar amo if e ount of the primary inp (labour) used in put producing a dollar's worth of the jth co ommodity, w can writ (by subtr we te racting each h colum sum in the above m mn t matrix from 1): m a01 = 0.3 0 a02 = 0.3 a03 = 0.4 ow e nput into "ju another industry" by adding ust y so no we can convert the primary in these elements to the inpu co-efficient matrix as follows: e ut s With the matrix A above, th closed in he nput outp system c be exp put can pressed in the fo we der orm rived earlier...Tx = (I A)x = d as follows: 231 Or sp pecifically, we ove get ) o em So, w said abo that to g a specific (unique) solution to the proble the techn nology matrix must be invertible.. e .. We k know that fo the close model th it won't b invertible but let's confirm this or ed hat be e, s by fin nding the determinant of the tech hnology mat trix. We wi use the fi row to ill irst expa along to evaluate t determi and o the inant... f minants is si imply the de eterminant that we Now, the first of the four 3 3 determ figure out in th open ver ed he rsion of the model. Th first one works out to be 0.384 his 4. 232 The second term of this de m eterminant c be foun as follow can nd ws: The t third term of this deter o rminant can be found as follows: n 233 The f fourth term of this...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/25/2010 for the course ECON 301 taught by Professor Sning during the Spring '10 term at University of Warsaw.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online