We use a conceptual framework that incorporates a

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ur is akin to the usual concept of an indifference curve. That is, a SWF contour is a curve that connects all of the combinations of individual welfare UA, UB having the same SWF level. W(UA, UB) = Thus, from a social point of view, every point on a social welfare contour is equally desirable. Society as a whole will be indifferent among all of the points on the same SWF contour. 193 Let's have a look at a few of the more famous social welfare functions. Just like individual utility functions, SWF can have any functional form such as square root, linear, Cobb-Douglas, Liontief, or CES. [1] The following SWF SWF = UA + UB indicates that society, as a whole, weigh consumers A and B equally by giving them the same weight of . This is a simple form of egalitarianism. UB 2 1 1 2 UA [2] On the other hand, the following SWF SWF = 2/3 UA + 1/3 UB indicates that society, as a whole, gives a larger weight to consumer A than consumer B. In other words, consumer A (say, the rich) is viewed as more important to society than consumer B (say, the poor). 194 UB 3 1 1 3/2 UA [3] Finally, the following SWF SWF = min{UA, UB} indicates that society, as a whole, identifies themselves as those having lower utility levels (say, the poor). This implies that society cares exclusively about a base minimum of utility for the poorest members of society. This is a simple form of the so-called Rawlsian Social welfare function. UB SWF contour for min {UA, UB} = 1 2 1 1 2 UA Fine. But does the SWF help us to break the indeterminacy of the Pareto Optimal Production model? 195 We'll use a diagram to show how the concept of a social welfare function can be used to break the indeterminacy of the problem. The choice problem of society as a whole is to choose one point out of infinitely many points on the Grand UPF. The analytical tools for this social choice problem consist of the following two curves: [1] an upward moving SWF contour representing social equity [2] a stationary Grand UPF representing economic efficiency The optimal choice for society is thus the point where the social welfare function contour is tangent to the Grand UPF (i.e. po...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/25/2010 for the course ECON 301 taught by Professor Sning during the Spring '10 term at University of Warsaw.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online