S the ual vity ty if this were the case then t

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: d lfa, Buck kwheat. Fu urther suppo that the gentlem are tryi to decid upon a ose ese men ing de Frida night act ay tivity. The c choices are going to see a movie (M), going to the Pub e e g b (P), o going to Dana Porte Library to study ECON 301 (L) or er o ). Kahneman and Tversky (1984 T 4) Kahneman and Tversky attribu this to individuals keep T ute ping "mental a accounts" in w which the saving are compa gs ared to the pri of the item on which they are receiv ice m ved. 8 7 336 It is a agreed that the household is to o t operate by m majority vot Now, th te. he prefe erences of these three "Little Ras t e scals" are as follows: Alfalf fa Buck kwheat Span nky M L P P M L P M L Ther is no problem with these individ re dual prefere ences, they are transit y tive and comp plete (ration nal). But in the contex of a majo n xt ority vote...a they? are pose that we take a pa wise vote between M and L... w air e Supp Alfalf and Spanky both pr fa refer M to L while Buckwheat pre efers L to M. Majority vote will be M and they wo a ould go to th movies. he M L Supp pose that we take a pa wise vote between L and P... w air e Alfalf and Buckwheat both prefer L t P while S fa to Spanky pref fers P to L. Majority vote will be L an they wou go to th library. nd uld he L P Supp pose that we take a pa wise vote between P and M... w air e Span and Buckwheat bo prefer P to M while Alfalfa pre nky oth e efers M to P Majority P. vote will be P and they would go to th pub. he P M given these pair wise v e votes the group decision preferen nces are as follows: s So, g M L P M and t househ the hold prefere ences have taken on a intransitiv form. Th an ve he intran nsitivity illus strated in th example is known as the Con his e ndorcet para adox and it t is the central pr e roblem for the theory o group decision making. of 337 OM RENCE RE ELATIONS TO UTILIT FUNCTIO TY ONS FRO PREFER In ec conomics, we like to us utility fun w se nctions to e express pre eference relations. A utility function u(x) ass...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/25/2010 for the course ECON 301 taught by Professor Sning during the Spring '10 term at University of Warsaw.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online