ETH 125 - Week 2 Day 5 Implicit Association Test CheckPoint

ETH 125 - Week 2 Day 5 Implicit Association Test CheckPoint...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Implicit Association Test CheckPoint The result of my Race IAT was determined as “Having a strong automatic preference for African American compared to European American” (via the Harvard-Hosted Implicit Association Test at ). It appears that the test results were not accurate in my case, as I do not feel that I have a prejudice against, or preference for, either race implied above. This assessment test was one of prejudice; because I did not respond quickly due to a lack of understand it automatically judge me as preferring African American compared to European American. Some people may not have well-developed eye-hand coordination which may affect their test results to display a non-accurate reading.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Overall though, this test may be a useful tool to measure prejudice as it is a way of tracking responses and reactions to images and words to see if there is a preference for any one category. Sociologists use other measurements to calculate prejudice as well. These measurements consist of using open-ended survey questions utilizing the Likert Scale and Bogardus Social Distance Scale. The survey using the Likert Scale and open-ended questions enables someone to answer a question in a manner that suits them, without limiting their answer to a few certain pre-chosen selections. The Bogardus Social Distance Scale determines the comfortableness of someone in the company of another race, ethnicity, or others with different attributes....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/30/2010 for the course ETH 125 taught by Professor Jameshenderson during the Spring '09 term at University of Phoenix.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online