The_Economist_on_Socrates - SOCRATES IN AMERICA Arguing to...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
Background image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: SOCRATES IN AMERICA Arguing to death L05 ANGELES From Socrates, history's quintessential nonconformist, lessons for America today IF THE most famous philosopher of all were alive today. he might find America remarkably similar to his own Athens of the fifth century BC. Socrates would witness a vibrant and proud democracy. and disdain it as an indulgence of the benighted. un- philosophical “herd”. He would interrogate America‘s politicians. talk-radio and cable-television pundits in search of honest discus- sions that lead to truth. and thereby expose their confusion. con- tradictions and ignorance. He would avail himself of America‘s as of Athens‘s freedom of speech, and simultaneously be horrified by the speciousness of the speech that Americans choose to make. And he would challenge America just as he had provoked Athens. and possibly be prosecuted and condemned for it a second time. Socrates throws down a gauntlet from antiquity to America and all other democracies. How could Athens. which prided itself on its freedoms and had for decades not only tolerated but de- lighted in the stings of the man who described himself as its “gad- fly". turn on its greatest mind and condemn him to death when he was 70 years old? Had Socrates exposed a terrible flaw in democ- racy? Or had democracy responded to a mortal threat from the likes of Socrates? His influence today is usually felt in academia. through the leg- acy of his ideas. He founded Western philosophy in the sense that all intellectual inquiry before him is deemed to be "pre-Socratic“ and all Western philosophy since him, in the words of Alfred North Whitehead. an English philosopher of the early 20th cen- tury. mere "foomotes" to the 35 Platonic dialogues in which Socra- tes was the main character. It was Socrates who made the momen- tous “turn” of Western thought away from speculation about the composition of the physical world and towards the liberal ques- tions of morality. justice. virtue and politics. But Socrates casts his influence far beyond academia. beyond even his ideas. His main contributions. arguably. were his method and style as well as the example of his life. His method was to The Economist December 19th 2009 question one or a few individuals in small settings (the "Apology". which records his address to the soo-man jury at his trial. was the exception). Through such intimate probing he elicited and tested his interlocutors' deepest and most hidden opinions. a process now known as Socratic dialectic. His style during the discussions was "ironic" in the original sense of eironeia. meaning that he pre- tended to be ignorant to prompt his interlocutors to open up. His life, above all. was dedicated to the 10ve of wisdom (philo- sophy). His wife, Xanthippe. and three sons lived in near-penury while Socrates loitered around the marketplace of Athens looking for debaters. In the end he sacrificed his life for philosophy when he was offered the opportunity to escape from prison before his execution but chose to swallow hem- lock instead. What. then. had Socrates revealed in Athenian democracy that made this mar- tyrdom necessary? And would American democracy be capable of repeating Ath- ens’s sin? Sympat/U'smg with Spatia— mg eqrnmlent of'tm American hm mg ma u 0'05 fO' The town-hall meeting Visiting America today. Socrates might have dropped in on last summer's “town hall" meetings, in which members of the public allegedly came to debate the reform of health care with their elected representatives. Socrates would have beheld hysteri- cal firebrands shouting that America's president and senators were Marxists. Nazis or both. Reaflirmed in his disdain for demo- cratic rhetoric. Socrates would have left to seek better conversa- tions. as he used to do in Athens. where he conspicuously shunned the public assembly and the jury courts in which male citizens were expected to serve. » IsmeCJi/md 61 SOCRATES IN AMERICA b 62 Socrates considered the debate in such settings unedifying. pointless and unworthyin a word, “eristic”. Eris was the Greek goddess of strife (the Roman Discordia). It was Eris who cunningly dropped a golden apple with the inscription “to the fairest” into a feast. inciting three goddesses-Hera. Athena and Aphrodite-to bicker over who deserved it and thus launching the ten-year Ito- jan War. Eris is present in presidential debates. in court rooms and wherever people are talking not to discover truth but to win. In 1968 Stringfellow Barr. an historian and president of St John's College in Maryland. wrote a Socratic critique of American discourse: “There is a pathos in television dialogue: the rapid ex‘ change of monologues that fail to find the issue. like ships passing in the night; the reiterated preface, ‘I think that....' as if it mattered who held which opinion rather than which opinion is worth holding: the impressive personal vanity that prevents each ‘dis- cussant' from really listening to another speaker". Socrates's alternative was “good” conversation or dialectic. To converse originally meant to turn towards one another. in order to find a common humanity and to move closer to the truth of some- thing. Dialectic, in other words. is decidedly not about winning or losing, because all the conversants are ennobled by it. It is a joint search. Unfortunately. as Mr Barr put it, it is also “the most difli- cult" kind of conversation “especially for Americans to achieve”. On a good day. Socrates’s conversations bore all the marks of dialectic. There was little long-winded monologue and much pithy back—and-forth. The conversation often meandered and sometimes Socrates contradicted himself. In the “Protagoras”. for example, he argues that virtue cannot be taught but in the "Meno" that it can. The conversations were at times humorous and invari- ably surprising. He hoped to bring all involved to a higher state of awareness. Because Socrates wanted to win converts to this conversation- al culture he often chose young and malleable men who appeared tempted by the eristic rhetoric he believed democracy encour- aged. For instance, Socrates tried hard to educate Alcibiades. the hedonistic and ambitious young man whose guardian Pericles was Athens‘s greatest statesman. He also went for a long walk in the countryside of Athens (which he hated leaving) with a young man named Phaedrus in order, very gently. to make the youth see the hollowness of a rhetorician he admired. Socrates as talk-show host But Socrates also sought out those whom he saw peddling the skills of eristic conversation. These were the travelling teachers who charged wealthy fathers to teach their sons the tools of power. the “sophists” such as Protagoras or 'I‘hrasymachus. And there were the rhetoricians. Socrates manoeuvred the most famous of them. Gorgias. into admitting that the aim of rhetoric is “rule over others in one’s city”. Gorgias even boasted that a master rhetorician unqualified in medicine could get himself elected as sur~ geon general over a qualified doctor who is not rhetorically gifted. In America today, Soc- rates would recognise sophists and rhetori- cians in partisan spin doctors such as Karl Rove and David Axelrod or equally in talk- show hosts such as Sean Hannity and Keith Olbermann. Using his irony. Socrates would make them feel overconfident. draw them out and then. through his questioning. expose their confusion and ignorance. Often this was done for the benefit of an impressionable young student who was listening. Because such conversations had to be bespoke for the participating individuals. Socrates refused ever to write anything down. As he said in the “Phaedrus”. text remains dumb when questioned and will be understood or misunderstood depending on who is reading it. The trouble was that. although his students. including Plato and Xenophon. who passed on Socrates’s conversations for posterity. saw him as noble. much of Athens did not. Instead. many Athe- nians detected an underlying arrogance in Socratic irony. Socrates thus resembled. say. the wiser-than-thou and often manipulative comedian-commentators Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert in to- day's America. Those who agreed with him found him funny and enlightening. The rest found him merely condescending. Socrates fed this image of arrogance. In his defence before the jury. he said that he acted on a divine mission from Apollo’s or- acle at Delphi in exposing so many as igno- rant. In Plato's version. Socrates claimed that the oracle had said “there is no one wis- er". With this presumed superiority. Socra- tes set out to prove the oracle wrong. Xeno~ phon‘s version is more arrogant yet. "Apollo answered that no man was more free than I. or more just. or more prudent." Socrates told the jury. “Apollo did not com- pare me to a god...he did. however. judge that I far excelled the rest of mankind." It is a tribute to the Athenians that they mostly embraced such megalomania as a charming quirk. They did. however. mock it. Aristophanes. a comic playwright who wrapped serious mes- sages in humour—as. say. Sacha Baron Cohen (aka Borat) does to- day—wrote an entire play. “The Clouds". to lampoon Socrates. In that comedy. an old farmer named Strepsiades wants to get out of the debts of his horse-racing son, Pheidippides, and sends him to an eccentric philosopher named Socrates who runs a “thinkery” where students learn to talk themselves out of any situ- ation (sophistry. in other words). The son successfully evades his creditors but also returns with strange ideas. Because Socrates has taught him that wisdom is the only authority. Pheidippides pro- ceeds to beat up his uneducated father. then threatens to do the same to his mother. Angry that his son has been corrupted. Strep- siades burns down Socrates‘s school The Socrates lampooned in the play. and probably laughing heartily in the audience. was 46 at the time and got on well with Aristophanes. Plato presents both men as having a jolly time to- gether in the “Symposium”. But already in “The Clouds". there are the familiar charges of Socrates corrupting the young and threaten- ing to subvert society and of being impious. Indeed. Aristophanes has Socrates arguing in his thinkery that “Zeus does not even ex- ist.” Addressing the jury 24 years later. Socrates claimed that this is where the charges originated. In the coming years. many Athenians, and especially those who had been embar- rassed by him. would learn to loathe Socra- tes. His dialectic was indeed surprisingly negative. Typically. he became obsessed with defining something abstract—What is justice? What is virtue?-and then twisted words to dismantle any opinion offered. In Xenophon‘s “Memorabilia”. a man named Hippias refuses to debate Socrates: “You mock at others. questioning and exam- ining everybody. and never willing to render an account yourself or to state an opinion about anything." he says. In Plato’s “Meno”. his interlocutor compares Socrates to “the flat torpedo sea-fish; for it benumbs anyone who approaches and touches it." Socrates had a talent for making people feel bad. He also. in effect. boycotted Athens as a » Socrates resembled. say, the t4."iseI'—than~ thou, often manipulative comedian, Jon Stewart The Economist December 19th 2009 b society. Socrates did his military duty but not his civic or jury duty. which he considered beneath him. By opting out of ordinary pub- lic life. he chose to be what Pericles in his funeral oration called an idiotes. a person who remains “private” when his country needs him in public life. Socrates as American Taliban Worse, he was suspected of sympathising with Sparta. Athens's enemy in the Peloponnesian War. An oligarchy in which rulers, warriors and workers had prescribed stations in life, Sparta had aspects of the "ideal" city that Socrates sketched in Plato's “Repub- lic". and it was fashionable among his students to admire Sparta. The equivalent would have been for a prominent American intel- lectual to be pro-Soviet in the cold war. or today to have kind words for Islamic Jihad. If Socrates had subversive tendencies, he never acted on them overtly. But he did seem to have a bad record with his students. Most famously. there was Alcibiades. who rose to power. talked the Athenians into send- ing an army to Sicily in a pre-emptive strike that turned into disaster. then defected to ad- vise the Spartan enemies on how best to fight Athens. then defected again (after sleeping with a Spartan king’s wife) to Athens’s other enemy. Persia. When Alcibiades speaks in Pla- to’s “Symposium”. it is to lament his failure to persuade Socrates to have sex with him. Another young man, Meno, is Socrates's chosen interlocutor on the subject of virtue. The same Meno then led an Athenian army to Persia where he betrayed his country and troops by seeking favour at the court of the Persian king. (Admittedly. another student of Socrates. Xenophon. then rescued the strand- ed Athenian army.) One of Socrates's three fu- ture accusers. Anytus. was present at his de— bate with Meno. Socrates’s oldest student was Antisthenes. who apparently became so frustrated with Socrates's habit of demolishing every con- ceivable opinion but not offering anything positive that he became the first of the Cynics. He concluded that all of democracy and poli- tics was silly, taunted the Athenians that they should have a majority vote declaring asses to be horses. and then suggested that every- body withdraw from public life altogether. The Cynics became “apolitical”—without a polis (city). apart from society. And there was of course Plato. But Plato never divulged his own views except. perhaps. through the words he attributed to Socrates. It is safe to say that he. too, disdained de- mocracy and was attracted to the Spartan alternative, all the more so since he was the cousin of a certain Critias and the nephew of a man named Charmides, both of whom he appears to have ad- mired and who became the rough Athenian equivalent of what Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri are to America. Ancient Athens after September 11th For Athens did have its version of September 11th 2001: an attack on its basic way of life. its freedom and security as a democracy. It had two such events, in fact. In 4113c, during the Peloponnesian war. a group of aristocratic Athenians including students of Socra- tes overthrew Athens‘s democracy in conspiracy with Alcibiades, who promised (but failed) to bring Persian support. This oligarchic junta lasted only a few months. Then, in 40430. a second coup toppled Athens’s democracy. Among its leaders were Plato's relatives. Critias and Charmides, The Economist December 19th 2009 SOCRATES IN AMERICA who appear in Plato's dialogues to be students of Socrates and who were in cahoots with the Spartans who had just won the Pel- oponnesian war. For much of a year. the oligarchs conducted a reign of terror. before Athens reclaimed its democracy. In 40130 the oligarchs were scheming a third coup. but failed. Socrates was put on trial two years later. He had played no part in the coups, but he was deemed suspect by association. His speeches. in light of recent events. struck the wrong chord and were considered inflammatory—like. say. the sermons of the American pastor. Jeremiah Wright. which forced Barack Obama. formerly in his congregation. to disavow him. Vaguer but plausi- bly. Socrates was accused of corrupting the young. The other charge, also familiar to Americans who distrust athe- ism in their public figures (even though their constitution would not admit it in court), was impiety. Socrates almost certainly was an atheist. As was his wont, however. he cared more about debat- ing. with a man named Euthrypho on the steps of the courthouse before his preliminary hearing. what piety even meant. In his perplexing defence before the jury. Socrates never addressed either charge di- rectly. Tiue to form. he attempted dialectic with his accusers. making them look con- fused and thus insulting them even more. Nonetheless, and to the great credit of the Athenians. the verdict was close. I.F. Stone in “The Itial of Socrates" estimates that 280 ju- rors voted guilty. 220 innocent. In his second speech. before his sentenc- ing. Socrates stepped up his invective. To his acquitters he was kind. But to the rest he was mocking. Xenophon believed that Socrates intentionally antagonised the jury because at this point he wanted. or needed, to die and become a martyr. If so, Socrates succeeded. Stone estimates that the margin in the second vote grew. to 360-140 in favour of execution. When his friend. Crito. came to Socrates‘s cell with an escape plan. Socrates chose to stay and drink the hemlock The nonconformist hem Who and what. then, was Socrates to Athens? Part of his glory derives from his incorrupt- ibility. his brave nonconformism, his detemii- nation to think as an individual not as part of “the herd". Nonconforrnism became a heroic value in the Western tradition that Socrates helped to found, especially in societies such as America’s that value individualism. But nonconfomiism is not an absolute virtue and easily veers off into sedition, subversion or other actions deemed unpatriotic. Psychologists suggest that people make constant trade~olfs in so- cial settings between, on one hand. insisting on their notion of truth and, on the other, the cohesion of a group. Sometimes truth and virtue require dissent and rebellion. Other times the survival or security of the group takes precedence and requires solidarity. If Socrates the free thinker belonged to a team. a club. a firm or a country today. he would never compromise his values, but he might well compromise his group. Stone concluded that Socrates was on the biggest “ego-trip" in history. He probably was. And yet Athens would soon regret hav- ing convicted him. His trial was an overreaction. a betrayal of Athenian values just as torturing terrorist suspects or wiretapping Americans after September 11th were betrayals of American val- ues. Democracies do betray themselves. Challengers such as Soc- rates exist to test society in its commitment to freedom and. if soci- ety fails the test, to remind it of the virtuous path. I 63 ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 06/06/2010 for the course HIST History 2A taught by Professor Linn during the Spring '10 term at UCSB.

Page1 / 3

The_Economist_on_Socrates - SOCRATES IN AMERICA Arguing to...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online