Grading_Rubric_INDIVIDUAL_CDS_061024

Grading_Rubric_INDIVIDUAL_CDS_061024 - Name: Katharine Yan...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Name: Katharine Yan Fang | Date: December 1, 2006 Document: Individual Conceptual Design Specification APS111 – 06 Grading Rubric The following table shows qualities that were taken into account when grading your assignment. However, the grade is based on an overall assessment; therefore, the qualities do not represent individual mark values. Your grade, plus further comments, can be found on the back of this sheet.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Name: Katharine Yan Fang | Date: December 1, 2006 Document: Individual Conceptual Design Specification Quality Exceeds Requirements Achieves Requirements Requires Revision to Meet Requirements Comments Credibili ty of Design Process 1. Document ready for client 2. All statements supported with persuasive evidence 3. Comprehensive 4. Shows considerable skill at applying the design process 5. Work is highly original 6. Document requires minor revision before sending to client 7. Statements supported with adequate evidence 8. All minimum requirements met. 9. All format requirements are met 10. Shows understanding of design process 11. Solution introduced appropriately 12. Original work 13. Document requires significant revision
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 06/09/2010 for the course ECO ECO100 taught by Professor Inheart during the Spring '09 term at University of Toronto- Toronto.

Page1 / 3

Grading_Rubric_INDIVIDUAL_CDS_061024 - Name: Katharine Yan...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online