Case Study (WK7)

Case Study (WK7) - Case Study(WK7 Brief Corliss v Wenner...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Case Study (WK7) Brief Corliss v. Wenner and Anderson on p. 591-593. Use pages 24-25 for reference. In your brief, you should include the following information: • the parties (Who is the plaintiff? The defendant? The appellant? The appellee?) • the history of the case (Who won at trial court? Who won at the lower appellate level? Who won in this decision?) • the facts (What happened that caused the plaintiff to sue?) • the plaintiff's theory (Why he thinks he is right) • the defendant's theory (Why she thinks she is right) • the legal issue (a yes or no question) • the holding of the court (Yes or no--answers the legal issue). What do you think? Was this case decided correctly? Why or why not ? P.S. Click on the Time Archive or the Archeology Archive to read an article concerning this case. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,988958,00.html http://www.archaeology.org/online/features/trove/index.html Yes, I think that this case was decided correctly, appeals court held that gold coins that were...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 06/08/2010 for the course MG 260DLB taught by Professor Brentgilje during the Fall '09 term at Park.

Page1 / 4

Case Study (WK7) - Case Study(WK7 Brief Corliss v Wenner...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online