This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Case Study (WK7) Brief Corliss v. Wenner and Anderson on p. 591-593. Use pages 24-25 for reference. In your brief, you should include the following information: • the parties (Who is the plaintiff? The defendant? The appellant? The appellee?) • the history of the case (Who won at trial court? Who won at the lower appellate level? Who won in this decision?) • the facts (What happened that caused the plaintiff to sue?) • the plaintiff's theory (Why he thinks he is right) • the defendant's theory (Why she thinks she is right) • the legal issue (a yes or no question) • the holding of the court (Yes or no--answers the legal issue). What do you think? Was this case decided correctly? Why or why not ? P.S. Click on the Time Archive or the Archeology Archive to read an article concerning this case. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,988958,00.html http://www.archaeology.org/online/features/trove/index.html Yes, I think that this case was decided correctly, appeals court held that gold coins that were...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/08/2010 for the course MG 260DLB taught by Professor Brentgilje during the Fall '09 term at Park.
- Fall '09
- Business Law