Case Study (WK5)

Case Study (WK5) - Case Study (WK5) Brief McCune v. Myrtle...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Case Study (WK5) Brief McCune v. Myrtle Beach Indoor Shooting Range, Inc. on p. 401-402. Use pages 24-25 for reference. In your brief, you should include the following information: the parties (Who is the plaintiff? The defendant? The appellant? The appellee?) the history of the case (Who won at trial court? Who won at the lower appellate level? Who won in this decision?) the facts (What happened that caused the plaintiff to sue?) the plaintiff's theory (Why he thinks he is right) the defendant's theory (Why she thinks she is right) the legal issue (a yes or no question) the holding of the court (Yes or no--answers the legal issue). What do you think? Was this case decided correctly? Why or why not? Yes, I think that this case was decided correctly. During McCune’s game play her mask came loose and ill fitting. She tried to have the mask tightened or replaced several times and a Range employee attempted to properly fit her mask for McCune. Even though the mask did not properly fit, she voluntarily continued to play the game, when she should have stopped. She voluntarily read & signed the waiver which released the Range from any liability of injury before she started
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 06/08/2010 for the course MG 260DLB taught by Professor Brentgilje during the Fall '09 term at Park.

Page1 / 5

Case Study (WK5) - Case Study (WK5) Brief McCune v. Myrtle...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online