State your stance on the Terri Schiavo case

  State your stance on the Terri Schiavo case - State...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
State your stance on the Terri Schiavo case, and identify the moral value judgment that influenced you to choose your stance. Now remember that you have to have some depth to your response, the last couple of DQ questions led me to believe some of you were cutting corners. Let's get the detail needed to ensure full thoughts get across to the reader, ok? Thanks! I can see both sides of the issue. I really didn’t get enough facts to make up my mind. As on the parents of Terri Schiavo’s side, they would want to do anything to keep her alive. The parents say she functions without a breathing tube, just need a feeding tube to eat. By removing the rights to her feeding tube this would starve her to death. In this wording, a choice to do that would sound harsh. This can pertain to moral relativism. The parents naturally don’t want to see their own daughter suffer pain. They argue a doctor say she can talk, just needs speech therapy. This is opinion till this doctor is documented. A doctor on the husband’s side said that Terri
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 06/10/2010 for the course CRT 205 crt 205 taught by Professor Darren during the Spring '10 term at University of Phoenix.

Page1 / 2

  State your stance on the Terri Schiavo case - State...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online