Unformatted text preview: expression of data,” similar to maps, diagrams, and portraits in which judges would analogize it. They simply aid the statement giving authority and significance to a testimony. The way how photograph was not quite resisted can be said the same to fingerprinting. First of all this evidence can be controlled. The judges get to choose whether the evidence is admissible which is important to them. Secondly, it does not threaten the judge’s position which is why photographs and fingerprinting is widely used instead of lie detectors. However, in my opinion DNA typing works the same way as fingerprinting and should be used in the court system....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/30/2010 for the course CAT cat 2 taught by Professor Golan during the Spring '10 term at UCSD.
- Spring '10