Crime_Causation_Geographical_Comparison

Crime_Causation_Geographical_Comparison - 1 Crime Causation...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Crime Causation Geographical Comparison By: Date: 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
The two theories on the causation of crime that I chose to compare and contrast are the trait theory and the learning theory. The reason why I chose these two is that they contrast one another the most. The trait theory states that there are certain characteristics that a person has that lead that person to become involved with criminal activity. The traits are biological or genetic. High testosterone levels are a trait that theorists link to high crime levels. Another factor that is linked to this theory is low IQ levels. According to trait theorists’ low IQ levels equals high crime levels. On the other hand, the learning theory suggests that delinquents and criminals are taught both the practical and the emotional skills necessary to partake in illegal activity. Edwin Sutherland in the 1940s saw crime as learned behavior. He and the theory imply that the [“teacher” is usually a family member or friend, who exposes the “student” to criminal behavior.] This theory is also known as the
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 07/15/2010 for the course BEH 125 taught by Professor Dsdfasdf during the Spring '10 term at Acton School of Business.

Page1 / 3

Crime_Causation_Geographical_Comparison - 1 Crime Causation...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online