Econ 100A Ans to PS2 - Department of Economics University...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Econ 100A-Spring 2010 Page 1 Problem Set 2 Answers Department of Economics Spring 2010 University of California Prof. Woroch Economics 100A PROBLEM SET 2 ANSWER SHEET I. SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS 1. For each of the following goods, explain whether you believe a price increase will lead to a large or small substitution effect and a large or small, positive or negative income effect: (i) common table salt, (ii) rent for a one bedroom apartment in Berkeley, (iii) a day ski pass to Northstar ski resort. Be sure to support your reasoning with real world examples. Answer: (i) Since most people do not spend a large portion of their income on table salt, we can imagine that the income effect could be negative; indeed, a little salt adds flavor but too much salt ruins it, so consumption will peak at a certain amount; there are no great substitutes for salt so the substitution effect will also be small. (ii) Most people spend a large fraction of their income on rent, therefore it is likely that there will be a large negative income effect involved with a price increase in rent (i.e., an individual's disposable income will be reduced substantially) and the substitution effect will depend on availability of substitutes (sharing an apart with a friend, moving back with your parents, living in your car). (iii) In this case, it is easy to imagine other forms of entertainment that compare to skiing, therefore we expect a large substitution effect but small (negative) income effect from an increase in the price of a day ski pass. 2. A consumer must choose whether to buy a computer for $1,000 and $120 per year for internet access for three years or she can receive a $400 rebate on the computer but agree to pay $300 per year for three years for internet access. At what yearly interest rate will the consumer be indifferent between the two options? Assume that the consumer is only concerned with the present value of the cost of a purchase plan. In that case, the consumer will be indifferent between the two plans when the interest is such that they have the same present value: 1,000 + 120 + 120(1+r) -1 + 120(1+r) -2 = 600 + 300 + 300(1+r) -1 + 300(1+r) -2 220 = 180(1+r) -1 + 180(1+r) -2 220(1+r) 2 -180(1+r)=180 220r 2 +260r-140=0 Notice that the first year’s payment for internet service is not discounted – as if it is paid upfront at the same time as the purchase price of the computer. In addition second and third year internet service payments must be made at the beginning of each of those two years. Using the quadratic formula ( i.e. , the solution to the quadratic equation ar 2 + br + c = 0 is given by the two values: r = [-b ± (b 2 – 4ac) ½ ]/2a ), we can solve for the value of r (the interest rate) which will make the consumer indifferent between the two alternatives. If we do this, we get that r = 40.2%. For any interest rate lower than this, the consumer will choose the first (non-rebate) option. (Note that while both plans extend over three years, we do not allow for any uncertainty regarding future payments.)
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 07/15/2010 for the course ECON 100A taught by Professor Woroch during the Spring '08 term at University of California, Berkeley.

Page1 / 9

Econ 100A Ans to PS2 - Department of Economics University...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online