Econ 100A Ans to PS2

# Econ 100A Ans to PS2 - Department of Economics University...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

Econ 100A-Spring 2008 Page 1 PS2 Answer Sheet Department of Economics Spring 2008 University of California Prof. Woroch Economics 100A PROBLEM SET 2 ANSWER SHEET I. TRUE or FALSE and EXPLAIN 1. If the price elasticity of demand for ballet tickets is around –1.2 in the local market, then the Zellerbach theater will increase its ticket revenues if it increases ticket prices a small percentage amount, e.g., 5%. FALSE. When elasticity equals to -1.2, a 1% increase in price will lead to a 1.2% decrease in sales. The amount of money from each ticket will be higher, but the number of tickets sold will be lower. For example, if the ticket price goes up by 5%,then Q will decrease by 5*1.2 = 6%. So since TR = P*Q, and since P 2 = 1.05*P 1 and Q 2 = (1 - 0.06)*Q 1 = 0.94*Q 1 then TR 2 = 0.94Q 1 * (1.05)P 1 = (0.99) Q 1 P 1 = 0.99TR 1 . So, TR declines. 2. Japanese consumers save significant amounts of their income even when their interest rates are nearly zero, while facing much higher interest rates, American consumers save almost nothing. One of these two groups must violate one of the rationality assumptions of consumer preferences over consumption streams. FALSE. T he relative preferences of consumers (indifference curves) for consumption in one period relative to another along with interest rates and income, will determine their optimal bundles of saving versus borrowing. Consumers on average, in Japan may have different preferences (utility functions), than those in the U.S., i.e. they may prefer to consume tomorrow (save) relative to today, while those in the U.S., prefer consumption today over tomorrow, on average. So the shapes of their indifference curves will differ, resulting in different optimal bundles of consumption today (borrowing) and consumption in the future (saving). 3. If a Herschel has a quasi-linear utility function for potatoes and a composite good, then, assuming he is a rational consumer, potatoes cannot be a Giffen good for him. TRUE. For Giffen goods, beyond a certain level of income, the good becomes so strongly inferior that the income effect swamps the substitution effect making the change in goods demanded negative for a price decrease. However, for a Quasi-linear utility function if potatoes form the non-linear portion of the utility function, the demand for potatoes will not depend upon income. So, Herschel will purchase the same ratio of potatoes no matter how much his income increases. In this case, there is no income effect, and so there can be no period over which it is a Giffen good. 4. If the production of tortillas exhibits diminishing marginal returns, then tortilla production must also exhibit decreasing returns to scale. FALSE. The concept of diminishing marginal returns requires the amount of one production factor to be held constant whereas return to scale allows all production factors to change. When all production factors double, output can be more than double even if one production factor manifests diminishing marginal returns. Therefore, it is possible to have diminishing return at the same time with increasing return to scale. Tortilla production might exhibit decreasing returns to scale but not necessarily MUST be so.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern