Econ 100A Ans to PS2

Econ 100A Ans to PS2 - Department of Economics University...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Econ 100A-Spring 2008 Page 1 PS2 Answer Sheet Department of Economics Spring 2008 University of California Prof. Woroch Economics 100A PROBLEM SET 2 ANSWER SHEET I. TRUE or FALSE and EXPLAIN 1. If the price elasticity of demand for ballet tickets is around –1.2 in the local market, then the Zellerbach theater will increase its ticket revenues if it increases ticket prices a small percentage amount, e.g., 5%. FALSE. When elasticity equals to -1.2, a 1% increase in price will lead to a 1.2% decrease in sales. The amount of money from each ticket will be higher, but the number of tickets sold will be lower. For example, if the ticket price goes up by 5%,then Q will decrease by 5*1.2 = 6%. So since TR = P*Q, and since P 2 = 1.05*P 1 and Q 2 = (1 - 0.06)*Q 1 = 0.94*Q 1 then TR 2 = 0.94Q 1 * (1.05)P 1 = (0.99) Q 1 P 1 = 0.99TR 1 . So, TR declines. 2. Japanese consumers save significant amounts of their income even when their interest rates are nearly zero, while facing much higher interest rates, American consumers save almost nothing. One of these two groups must violate one of the rationality assumptions of consumer preferences over consumption streams. FALSE. T he relative preferences of consumers (indifference curves) for consumption in one period relative to another along with interest rates and income, will determine their optimal bundles of saving versus borrowing. Consumers on average, in Japan may have different preferences (utility functions), than those in the U.S., i.e. they may prefer to consume tomorrow (save) relative to today, while those in the U.S., prefer consumption today over tomorrow, on average. So the shapes of their indifference curves will differ, resulting in different optimal bundles of consumption today (borrowing) and consumption in the future (saving). 3. If a Herschel has a quasi-linear utility function for potatoes and a composite good, then, assuming he is a rational consumer, potatoes cannot be a Giffen good for him. TRUE. For Giffen goods, beyond a certain level of income, the good becomes so strongly inferior that the income effect swamps the substitution effect making the change in goods demanded negative for a price decrease. However, for a Quasi-linear utility function if potatoes form the non-linear portion of the utility function, the demand for potatoes will not depend upon income. So, Herschel will purchase the same ratio of potatoes no matter how much his income increases. In this case, there is no income effect, and so there can be no period over which it is a Giffen good. 4. If the production of tortillas exhibits diminishing marginal returns, then tortilla production must also exhibit decreasing returns to scale. FALSE. The concept of diminishing marginal returns requires the amount of one production factor to be
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 07/15/2010 for the course ECON 100A taught by Professor Woroch during the Spring '08 term at Berkeley.

Page1 / 9

Econ 100A Ans to PS2 - Department of Economics University...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online