lec19

lec19 - Scott Hughes 26 April 2005 Massachusetts Institute...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Scott Hughes 26 April 2005 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics 8.022 Spring 2005 Lecture 19: Displacement current. Maxwell’s equations. 19.1 Inconsistent equations Over the course of this semester, we have derived 4 relationships between the electric and magnetic fields on the one hand, and charge and current density on the other. They are: Gauss’s law: ~ ∇· ~ E = 4 πρ Magnetic law: ~ ∇· ~ B = 0 Faraday’s law: ~ ∇× ~ E =- 1 c ∂ ~ B ∂t Ampere’s law: ~ ∇× ~ B = 4 π ~ J c As written, these equations are slightly inconsistent. We can see this inconsistency very easily — we just take the divergence of both sides of Ampere’s law. Look at the left hand side first: Left hand side: ~ ∇· ‡ ~ ∇× ~ B · = 0 . This follows from the rule that the divergence of the curl is always zero (as you proved on pset 3). Now look at the right hand side: Right hand side: ~ ∇· 4 π ~ J c =- 4 π c ∂ρ ∂t . Here, I’ve used the continuity equation, ~ ∇· ~ J =- ∂ρ/∂t . Ampere’s law is inconsistent with the continuity equation except when ∂ρ/∂t = 0 !!! A charge density that is constant in time is actually a fairly common circumstance in many applications, so it’s not too surprising that we can go pretty far with this “incomplete” version of Ampere’s law. But, as a matter of principle — and, as we shall soon see, of practice as well — it’s just not right. We need to fix it somehow. 19.2 Fixing the inconsistency We can fix up this annoying little inconsistency by inspired guesswork. When we take the divergence of Ampere’s left hand side, we get zero — no uncertainty about this whatsoever, it’s just ZERO. We should be able to add a function to the right hand side such that the divergence of the right side is forced to be zero as well. Let’s suppose that our “generalized Ampere’s law” takes the form ~ ∇× ~ B = 4 π ~ J c + ~ F . 177 Our goal now is to figure out what ~ F must be. Taking the divergence of both sides, we find = 4 π ~ ∇· ~ J c + ~ ∇· ~ F-→ ~ ∇· ‡ c ~ F · = 4 π ∂ρ ∂t . Our mystery function has the property that when we take its divergence (and multiply by c ), we get the rate of change of charge density. This looks a lot like Gauss’s law! If we take the time derivative of Gauss’s law, we have ∂ ∂t ~ ∇· ~ E = 4 π ∂ρ ∂t-→ 4 π ∂ρ ∂t = ~ ∇· ∂ ~ E ∂t On the last line, I’ve use the fact that it is OK to exchange the order of partial derivatives: ∂ ∂t ~ ∇ = ˆ x ∂ ∂t ∂ ∂x + ˆ y ∂ ∂t ∂ ∂y + ˆ z ∂ ∂t ∂ ∂z = ˆ x ∂ ∂x ∂ ∂t + ˆ y ∂ ∂y ∂ ∂t + ˆ z ∂ ∂z ∂ ∂t = ~ ∇ ∂ ∂t ....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 9

lec19 - Scott Hughes 26 April 2005 Massachusetts Institute...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online