This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Finding absolute extrema for “nice” functions Math 8 2009, Chris Lyons Let’s suppose you’re given a function f : [ a,b ] → R and you know that it’s continuous. Even this little bit of information already tells you something: Theorem 1 (Thm 3.12 in Apostol) . If g : [ α,β ] → R is continuous, then there is at least one point γ ∈ [ α,β ] such that g ( γ ) is the absolute maximum of g . Similarly, there is at least one point δ ∈ [ α,β ] such that g ( δ ) is the absolute minimum of g . So by this theorem you know there are xvalues in [ a,b ] where f takes its absolute maximum and absolute minimum... but how do you actually find these xvalues? If you look at the proof of Theorem 1, it’s of no help: it shows you that these xvalues exist, by using the completeness axiom for the real numbers, but it doesn’t actually give a way of finding them. (Proofs like this are called “nonconstructive” proofs.) But if your function f is nice enough, then you can actually find these points! We’ll see at the end what I mean by “nice enough”. First, let’s make the following observation, which may look kind of useless, but isI mean by “nice enough”....
View
Full
Document
 Fall '08
 Vuletic,M
 Math, Calculus, relative maximum, Apostol, absolute maximum, absolute minimum, final conclusion

Click to edit the document details