RLG 203 EXAM PREP STUDY NOTES WHOLE COURSE PG.11

RLG 203 EXAM PREP STUDY NOTES WHOLE COURSE PG.11 - He...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
He decides on the order and mentions that disputed writings of (the epistle of james and jude, the second epistle of peter and the second and third of john even though he wasn’t sure they were written by the same person.) are acpted my many.   He also mensions some rejected books, some rejected the apocolase of john while others accepted it. But the apocolacase of peter was rejected the acts of paul, and some others were rejected so not included in the canon.   Eucebious only seems to have put the ones in the canon that were accepted by the majority and excluded the disputed and rejected ones. The only disputed one that he included was the apocolase of john. He intened the disputed writings not to be included in the official canon, but known to people.   The gospels of peter , Thomas. Matthais and the acts of the apostles were considered not true and genuine not even the eclesiasticl writers of the time thought they were true. They were considered fictions of heretics and were not even to be placed among the disputed
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

RLG 203 EXAM PREP STUDY NOTES WHOLE COURSE PG.11 - He...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online