This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: A r g u m e n t E v a l u a t i o n 1 Argument Evaluation Brett Grumm June 20, 2010 A r g u m e n t E v a l u a t i o n 2 The first argument I have chosen for this week’s assignment is how in America automobiles are compared to the attacks on 9/11. The premise of this argument is how the writer refers the attacks from September 11, as a tragedy that makes Americans be more prone to react with rage, even more so if this tragedy was closer to where they reside. Another premise In this argument is for Americans to instead think that the odds of being killed in a car accident is greater and more people are killed from this these incidents, especially when it’s closer to home rather than New York or other major cities. I believe that in this argument the premise is dependant to the conclusion because the claims are supported with the writer’s argument. For the argument that I picked I believe it is deductively invalid, because most of the terrorist attacks are planned over time and organized to attack its target without getting caught to create...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 07/27/2010 for the course CRT205 205 taught by Professor D.simon during the Summer '10 term at University of Phoenix.
- Summer '10