Unformatted text preview: be worthy. DQ 2: I believe that this example requires inductive logic because even though the child says that she did not steal the cookies because her hands are not dirty, she very well could of. It is possible that she stole the cookies using a napkin to grab them. I believe the premises in this example is that there is that the child claims there is no chocolate on hers hands for an argument that she did not steal the cookies, so that means a premises is stated. The conclusion is that the child did not steal the cookies because she states her hands are not stained. I do not believe this is a good argument because if she took the cookies, there is numerous amount of ways she could have covered it up. The child could have had someone else get them for her so that she would not get into trouble....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 07/27/2010 for the course CRT205 205 taught by Professor D.simon during the Summer '10 term at University of Phoenix.
- Summer '10