week3 part 2 argument credibility

week3 part 2 argument credibility - Response to Check Point...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Response to Check Point Check Point: Part II The review of the original news source was about Allan Greenspan giving claims about the housing market and how people are losing their homes because of the economy. The article didn’t give much information or anything to back up Greenspan’s claims, which the classmate also found. My classmate did accurately identify the claims, but should have given examples of how it has affected her in some way, in order to compare with her/his observations. I think I would have made at least some comparison or an example’s of a solution for the solution to the situation. I didn’t see where the author was biased in anyway and my classmate did make the correct judgment. The concepts from the feedback tutorial I seen should of gave more examples, and showed great ways to respond to situations. I think it is very important to give a correct feedback. I gave examples on which way to respond, on which way I could have presented it. Classmates Review:
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 07/27/2010 for the course CRT205 205 taught by Professor D.simon during the Summer '10 term at University of Phoenix.

Page1 / 2

week3 part 2 argument credibility - Response to Check Point...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online