This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: EDITORIALS june 19, 2010 vol xlv no 25 EPW Economic & Political Weekly 8 Breaking a Consensus The non-Maoist coalition repudiates an agreement that saved Nepal from a constitutional crisis. T wo years ago, Nepal witnessed a revolutionary transition from a monarchy to a republic. The task of writing the constitution of the new republic was left to an elected con- stituent assembly ( CA ), which was supposed to finish its work by 28 May this year. Yet, political squabbling, an inability to reach a consensus on vital issues and a general environment of mistrust meant that the deadline was sure to pass without a constitution having been adopted. The critical issue confronting the main actors – the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Marxist-Leninist) [ UML ] and the Nepali Congress – was whether the term of the CA could be extended for a specific period. A consensus was reached last month at the eleventh hour when the three parties managed to wring out a three-point agreement that extended the CA by a year, reiterated a commitment to cooperation in completing the peace process (as per the Comprehensive Peace Accord signed in 2006) and committed the parties to the formation of a national consensus government with the resignation of the incumbent prime minister Madhav Kumar Nepal. The agreement was supposed to have finally brought to an end the confrontation between the Maoists and the other main parties, which started with the resignation of Maoist chairman Pushpa Kumar Dahal...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 07/31/2010 for the course FIN 201 taught by Professor Hcverma during the Summer '10 term at IIT Kanpur.
- Summer '10