E071010_Stagnation_on_the_Anvil

E071010_Stagnation_on_the_Anvil - EDITORIALS july 10, 2010...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: EDITORIALS july 10, 2010 vol xlv no 28 EPW Economic & Political Weekly 8 Stagnation on the Anvil? With the kind of policies being imposed on the Eurozone, another Great Depression cannot be ruled out. T here are some differences between the United States (uS) and Germany over the latter’s adherence to the principles of neo-mercantilism and “sound finance” (balanced budgets) in the process of coordinating the global economic recovery under the auspices of the G-20. But the G-20 summit at Toronto on 26-27 June did not witness any face-off, at least not in the open for all to see. And yet, the perils of rapidly moving towards fiscal austerity and of restruc- turing the Eurozone in the manner sought by Germany, both possibly leading to economic stagnation, are all too evident to be disregarded. The declaration issued at the end of the summit, however, skilfully papered over the controversy between the “deficit hawks” and the “deficit doves”, Germany leading the former and the US heading the latter. In the wake of the so-called sovereign debt crisis in the Euro zone, the German government apparently stuck to its position that fiscal deficits and public debts, both as a proportion of gross domestic product ( GDP ), had to be slashed, but the US , while agreeing that “we cannot continue to borrow against our children’s future”, felt that too rapid a pace of fiscal consolidation might threaten glo- bal recovery. So the communiqué, while calling for a change of policy in the direction of reducing budget deficits and retiring gov- ernment debt, added that the agenda be “tailored to national cir-...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online