E071710_Hazy_Reflections - EDITORIALS vol xlv no 29 EPW...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: EDITORIALS july 17, 2010 vol xlv no 29 EPW Economic & Political Weekly 8 Hazy Reflections The draft Cinematograph Bill 2010 fails to reflect the extensive changes in technology and public attitudes. F or some years now, film-makers in the country, including documentary makers, have been demanding a compre- hensive review of the Cinematograph Act of 1952, which will bring it in tune with changes in mass media technology as well as public attitudes towards hitherto taboo issues. The makers of award winning documentaries like War and Peace (on global militarism and nuclear testing) and Final Solutions (on the Godhra riots in Gujarat) had to either depend on the intervention of the courts or sustained public campaigns to be allowed to show their films. In the commercial arena, film- makers are routinely asked to cut out dialogues or scenes which might affect the tender sensibilities of some religious, regional or politically powerful group. Now, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has come out with the draft Cinematograph Bill 2010. But it is hardly an improvement on the existing act. In the first half of the 20th century, the hypodermic needle theory was widely accepted in the west to describe the impact of the mass media on the consumer’s mind, especially that of the “vulnerable” young. Later this view was discarded when it was realised that there are too many complex factors determining the extent and intensity of the impact. Also, the omnipresence of television and the internet made the official censorship of cinema...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 07/31/2010 for the course FIN 201 taught by Professor Hcverma during the Summer '10 term at IIT Kanpur.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online