This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: (Nev. 1991). Application: Due to the negligent from the hotel, malice acts were brought upon on Paula. Also in Nevada, these intentional acts warrant legal precautionary actions to be taken place on the behalf of the defendant. Conclusion: The decision was in favor of the defendant because no measures were taken to ensure that such crimes wouldnt happen in their establishment. Since there is evidence proving that Paula was oppressed and malice acts of violence was committed in the Las Vegas Hilton hotel then compensation and punitive damages will be awarded to her according to Nevada laws. As a result both Tailhook and Hilton hotel will have to pay Paula....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 08/01/2010 for the course BLAW/531 531 taught by Professor Charnell during the Summer '10 term at University of Phoenix.
- Summer '10