In other words every unspecified variation will

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: , α ] ⎥ ⎢ [α, α ] ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎡β , β ⎤ ⎥ ⎢ ⎡β, β ⎤ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ [ δ , δ ] ⎥ FR ⎢ [ δ, δ ] ⎥ FEi ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ 77 ⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎦ (2) Where: : Small displacements torsors associated to some functional requirement (play, gap, clearance) represented as a [FR] vector or some Functional Element uncertainties (tolerance, kinematic link, ….) also represented as [FE] vectors ; : Jacobian matrix expressing a geometrical relation between a [FR] vector and some corresponding [FE] vector; : Number of torsors in a kinematic chain; : Lower limit of u , v, w, α , β , δ ; : Upper limit of u , v, w, α , β , δ . ⎡ J 1 J 2 J 3 J 4 J 5 J 6 ⎤ FE i ⎣ ⎦ N u , v, w, α , β , δ u , v , w, α , β , δ The details on the construction of the Jacobian will not be presented in this paper and the reader will be referred to [Desrochers et al., 2003] for that purpose. In the following section, the proposed typology will be now presented and its classes and features explained...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/03/2010 for the course DD 1234 taught by Professor Zczxc during the Spring '10 term at Magnolia Bible.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online