Rmean improved to 023 4 surface 3 on part 2 was

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: resented by [Liao, 2003]. A fixture design methodology for sheet metal assemblies by using computer experiments has been presented by [Dahlström and Camelio, 2003]. Finally, a contact modeling algorithm implemented into the Method of Influence Coefficient to prevent penetrations between parts has been presented by [Dahlström and Lindkvist, 2004]. 1.3. Validation of variation simulation methods for sheet metal assemblies Despite that many methods and tools have been developed for variation simulation in the past years, there are few papers on validation of the methods compared to real production inspection data. The reason for this could be that it is difficult to access inspection data and models from industry. Often, the validation consists of comparing the simulation result from different methods against each other and not to real inspection data. [Cai et al., 2003] compared two methods, the Monte Carlo Simulation and the Taylor Series Expansion that are provided from the method EAVS (Elastic Practical Implications in Tolerance Analysis...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/03/2010 for the course DD 1234 taught by Professor Zczxc during the Spring '10 term at Magnolia Bible.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online