Econ140A_Chap17_Sol

Econ140A_Chap17_Sol - CHAPTER 17 TEACHING NOTES I emphasize...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CHAPTER 17 TEACHING NOTES I emphasize to the students that, first and foremost, the reason we use the probit and logit models is to obtain more reasonable functional forms for the response probability. Once we move to a nonlinear model with a fully specified conditional distribution, it makes sense to use the efficient estimation procedure, maximum likelihood. It is important to spend some time on interpreting probit and logit estimates. In particular, the students should know the rules-of-thumb for comparing probit, logit, and LPM estimates. Beginners sometimes mistakenly think that, because the probit and especially the logit estimates are much larger than the LPM estimates, the explanatory variables now have larger estimated effects on the response probabilities than in the LPM case. This may or may not be true, and can only be determined by computing partial effects for the probit and logit models. The two most common ways of compute the partial effects are the so-called “average partial effects” (APE), where the partial effects for each unit are averaged across all observations (or interesting subsets of observations), and the “partial effects at the average” (PAE). The PAEs are routinely computed by many econometrics packages, but they seem to be less useful than the APEs. The APEs have a more straightforward meaning in most cases and are more comparable to linear probability model estimates. I view the Tobit model, when properly applied, as improving functional form for corner solution outcomes. (I believe this motivated Tobin’s original work, too.) In most cases, it is wrong to view a Tobit application as a data-censoring problem (unless there is true data censoring in collecting the data or because of institutional constraints). For example, in using survey data to estimate the demand for a new product, say a safer pesticide to be used in farming, some farmers will demand zero at the going price, while some will demand positive pounds per acre. There is no data censoring here: some farmers simply find it optimal to use none of the new pesticide. The Tobit model provides more realistic functional forms for E( y | x ) and E( y | y > 0, x ) than a linear model for y . With the Tobit model, students may be tempted to compare the Tobit estimates with those from the linear model and conclude that the Tobit estimates imply larger effects for the independent variables. But, as with probit and logit, the Tobit estimates must be scaled down to be comparable with OLS estimates in a linear model. [See Equation (17.27); for examples, see Computer Exercise C17.3 and C17.12 The latter goes through calculation an average partial effect for a (roughly) continuous explanatory variable.] Poisson regression with an exponential conditional mean is used primarily to improve over a linear functional form for E( y | x ) for count data. The parameters are easy to interpret as semi- elasticities or elasticities. If the Poisson distributional assumption is correct, we can use the Poisson distribution to compute probabilities, too.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 21

Econ140A_Chap17_Sol - CHAPTER 17 TEACHING NOTES I emphasize...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online