hw2_solution

hw2_solution - ME201 Advanced Dynamics (Fall 2007) HW-2...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ME201 Advanced Dynamics (Fall 2007) HW-2 Solution ( 100 pts ) 1. 50pts Consider the system of two oscillating equal masses given by m x 1 =- kx 1 + c 1 ( x 1- x 2 ) + c 2 ( x 1- x 2 ) 3 m x 2 =- kx 2- c 1 ( x 1- x 2 )- c 2 ( x 1- x 2 ) 3 (a) Is this a conservative system? At first, you may want to integrate the right hand sides to obtain potentials and see if the time derivative of the Hamiltonian is zero. This works for this system, but what happens if it doesnt. Does that mean that there exists no invariant function for the dynamics? So we want to analyze this in a way that doesnt use this unknown potential function. Another way to think of this is that all conservative systems do not necessarily have the symmetries of a Hamiltonian system (or are not Hamiltonian). So trying to show that a system is Hamiltonian, to show that it is conservative, may not be the best approach. From Arnolds book on mechanics we have that a system if conservative if there exists a function U : E 2 R such that f =- U x where both f and x are vectors. This is not directly helpful as we dont have the function U that is being discussed here. However, we can do some manipulations to obtains something useful. From the definition we have: f 1 =- U ( x 1 ,x 2 ) x 1 f 2 =- U ( x 1 ,x 2 ) x 2 To simplify things, we can take the partial of the first equation with respect to x 2 and the second with respect to x 1 . We then use the fact that for a continuously differential U ( x 1 ,x 2 ), 2 U ( x 1 ,x 2 ) x 1 x 2 = 2 U ( x 1 ,x 2 ) x 2 x 1 to get a simple relation that does not involve U. f 1 x 2 = x 2- U ( x 1 ,x 2 ) x 1 f 2 x 1 = x 1- U ( x 1 ,x 2 ) x 2 f 1 x 2 = f 2 x 1 The last equality is an equality that is easiest route to show that the system is conservative. As an aside, a conservative system admits closed contours in its phase space. Therefore, the contour integral on this space should equal zero. That is: I ( f 1 dx 1 + f 2 dx 2 ) = 0 By Greens theorem we have I ( f 1 dx 1 + f 2 dx 2 ) = Z Z f 2 x 1- f 1 x 2 dx 1 dx 2 = 0 ME201 Advanced Dynamics 1 HW2 Solution This is the same result. Now plugging in our actual equations:This is the same result....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/06/2010 for the course ME 201 taught by Professor Mezic,i during the Fall '08 term at UCSB.

Page1 / 5

hw2_solution - ME201 Advanced Dynamics (Fall 2007) HW-2...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online