Final Exam study notes

# Final Exam study notes - Critical Thinking Final Exam study...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

Final Exam study notes Inductive Arguments Support, but cannot prove their conclusions relatively strong or weak depending on the premises Strength and Probability Strength is not connected to probability An argument can be strong, while the conclusion has a low probability o Kind I: inductive/statistical Syllogisms Argues from general to specific Common Form Most x’s are y’s, this is an x, so probably this is a y. o Kind II: Inductive Generalizations Argues from specific to general Common Form P% of observed x’s are y’s, so p% of all x’s are y’s o Sample – observed x’s o Target Population – all x’s o Feature – property of being y o Sample size - # observed Evaluation o Identify target population Related Factors – factor that the presence or absence is important o Sample Representative – sample perfectly represents target population Random – All people in target population have equal opportunity to be included in sample Biased – not random o Kind III: Inductive Analogical Arguments Common Form X and Y both have properties p, q, r, etc., X has feature F, so Y has

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

## This note was uploaded on 08/21/2010 for the course PHIL 120 taught by Professor No during the Fall '09 term at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne.

### Page1 / 4

Final Exam study notes - Critical Thinking Final Exam study...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online