{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

weakinstrumentslides

# weakinstrumentslides - Introduction to GMM with Weak...

This preview shows pages 1–11. Sign up to view the full content.

Introduction to GMM with Weak Instruments Eric Zivot December 9, 2009

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
Monte Carlo Experiment to Illustrate Problem with 2SLS with Weak Instru- ments Reference: Zivot, Startz and Nelson (1998). Valid Con fi dence Intervals and Inference in the Presence of Weak Instruments, International Economic Review . y i = z i δ + ε i , i = 1 , . . . , n z i = x 0 i (1 × k ) π ( k × 1) + v i Ã ε i v i ! iid N ÃÃ 0 0 ! , Ã 1 ρ ρ 1 !! x i iid N (0 , I k )
Remarks 1. ρ captures the degree of endogeneity; ρ 0 low endogeneity; ρ 1 high endogeneity 2. π captures the strength of the instruments; π 0 weak instruments.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
Review of 2SLS estimation of δ Errors are conditionally homoskedastic so e cient GMM is 2SLS ˆ δ 2 SLS = ( z 0 P X z ) 1 z 0 P X y = δ + ( z 0 P X z ) 1 z 0 P X ε For fi xed π 6 = 0 n ³ ˆ δ 2 SLS δ ´ d N (0 , σ 2 ε ( π 0 Σ xx π ) 1 ) ˆ δ 2 SLS N ( δ, n 1 σ 2 ε ( π 0 Σ xx π ) 1 ) With σ ε = 1 and Σ xx = E [ x i x 0 i ] = I k we have avar( ˆ δ 2 SLS ) = ( π 0 π ) 1 Clearly, if π = 0 then avar( ˆ δ 2 SLS ) is not de fi ned.
Monte Carlo Design Parameters δ = 1 ρ = 0 . 99 (very high endogeneity) k = 1 , 4; n = 100 Instrument cases 1. Irrelevant instruments: k = 1 : π = 0 k = 4 : π = (0 , 0 , 0 , 0) 0 2. Weak instruments: k = 1 : π = 0 . 1 k = 4 : π = (0 . 1 , 0 , 0 , 0) 0

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
3. Strong instruments: k = 1 : π = 1 k = 4 : π = (1 , 0 , 0 , 0) 0
Monte Carlo Experiment Goal: evaluate inference on δ using 2SLS 1. Simulate data from model 10,000 times 2. Compute ˆ δ 2 SLS and t-stat for testing δ = 1 t = ˆ δ 2 SLS 1 c SE( ˆ δ 2 SLS ) 3. Compute asymptotic 95% con fi dence interval for δ ˆ δ 2 SLS ± 1 . 96 · c SE( ˆ δ 2 SLS )

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
4. Determine if | t | > 1 . 96 (equivalently, δ 95% CI) Empirical size of 5% t-test # times | t | > 1 . 96
Monte Carlo Results Empirical Size of 5% t-test Instrument Quality k=1 k=4 Strong .055 .084 Weak .193 .855 Irrelevant .632 .987 Conclusion: Traditional asymptotic theory is not appropriate for 2SLS in the presence of weak instruments, particularly if endogeneity is high and there are many weak instruments.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
Staiger-Stock Weak Instrument Asymptotics Reference: Staiger and Stock (1997), “Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments, Econometrica .
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}