weakinstrumentslides

- Introduction to GMM with Weak Instruments Eric Zivot December 9 2009 Monte Carlo Experiment to Illustrate Problem with 2SLS with Weak

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–10. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Introduction to GMM with Weak Instruments Eric Zivot December 9, 2009
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Monte Carlo Experiment to Illustrate Problem with 2SLS with Weak Instru- ments Reference: Zivot, Startz and Nelson (1998). Valid Con f dence Intervals and Inference in the Presence of Weak Instruments, International Economic Review . y i = z i δ + ε i ,i =1 ,...,n z i = x 0 i (1 × k ) π ( k × 1) + v i à ε i v i ! iid N Ãà 0 0 ! , à 1 ρ ρ 1 !! x i iid N (0 , I k )
Background image of page 2
Remarks 1. ρ captures the degree of endogeneity; ρ 0 low endogeneity; ρ 1 high endogeneity 2. π captures the strength of the instruments; π 0 weak instruments.
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Review of 2SLS estimation of δ Errors are conditionally homoskedastic so e cient GMM is 2SLS ˆ δ 2 SLS =( z 0 P X z ) 1 z 0 P X y = δ +( z 0 P X z ) 1 z 0 P X ε For f xed π 6 =0 n ³ ˆ δ 2 SLS δ ´ d N (0 2 ε ( π 0 Σ xx π ) 1 ) ˆ δ 2 SLS N ( δ,n 1 σ 2 ε ( π 0 Σ xx π ) 1 ) With σ ε =1 and Σ xx = E [ x i x 0 i ]= I k we have avar( ˆ δ 2 SLS )=( π 0 π ) 1 Clearly, if π =0 then avar( ˆ δ 2 SLS ) is not de f ned.
Background image of page 4
Monte Carlo Design Parameters δ =1 ρ =0 . 99 (very high endogeneity) k =1 , 4; n = 100 Instrument cases 1. Irrelevant instruments: k =1 : π =0 k =4 : π =(0 , 0 , 0 , 0) 0 2. Weak instruments: k =1 : π =0 . 1 k =4 : π =(0 . 1 , 0 , 0 , 0) 0
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
3. Strong instruments: k =1 : π =1 k =4 : π =(1 , 0 , 0 , 0) 0
Background image of page 6
Monte Carlo Experiment Goal: evaluate inference on δ using 2SLS 1. Simulate data from model 10,000 times 2. Compute ˆ δ 2 SLS and t-stat for testing δ =1 t = ˆ δ 2 SLS 1 c SE( ˆ δ 2 SLS ) 3. Compute asymptotic 95% con f dence interval for δ ˆ δ 2 SLS ± 1 . 96 · c SE( ˆ δ 2 SLS )
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
4. Determine if | t | > 1 . 96 (equivalently, δ 95% CI) Empirical size of 5% t-test # times | t | > 1 . 96
Background image of page 8
Monte Carlo Results Empirical Size of 5% t-test Instrument Quality k=1 k=4 Strong .055 .084 Weak .193 .855 Irrelevant .632 .987 Conclusion: Traditional asymptotic theory is not appropriate for 2SLS in the
Background image of page 9

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 10
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 08/23/2010 for the course ECON 583 taught by Professor Zivot during the Fall '09 term at W. Alabama.

Page1 / 28

- Introduction to GMM with Weak Instruments Eric Zivot December 9 2009 Monte Carlo Experiment to Illustrate Problem with 2SLS with Weak

This preview shows document pages 1 - 10. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online