Dog Bite - The Dog Bite Colin Fleming Buse 140 1....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The Dog Bite Colin Fleming – Buse 140 1. Negligence per se is a legal term, which means that a person who is prudent and has committed an act of negligence thereby harming the peace, law & order, or damage to someone, but is very much believable and need not required to be proved that it was due negligence. i. There are several elements in which negligence per se relates to this dog bite case: 1. The dogs were not on a leash. It is common knowledge that dogs must be kept on a leash at times when it is not on their private property. 2. The statute is such so that safety is followed 3. The act caused the kind of harm the statute was designed to prevent 2. California Civil Code 3342: The owner of any dog is liable for the damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place or lawfully in a private place, including the property of the owner of the dog, regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owner's knowledge of such viciousness. A person is lawfully
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 08/28/2010 for the course BUSE 140 taught by Professor Jefferies during the Spring '08 term at San Diego.

Page1 / 2

Dog Bite - The Dog Bite Colin Fleming Buse 140 1....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online