MGT 216 LTA Pinto paper - The Ford Pinto Case 1 The Ford...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The Ford Pinto Case 1 The Ford Pinto Case MGT 216 University of Phoenix The Ford Pinto Case
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
The Ford Pinto Case 2 In the early 70’s the dilemma involving the explosion of Ford Pinto’s, due to a defective fuel system design, led to the debate of many issues, one being Ford’s unethical decision not to upgrade their fuel system. The Ford Pinto appeared on the market in 1970, and sales of the car were excellent for the first few years. However, these early model Pinto’s had problems with leaking fuel and catching on fire after minor rear-end collisions, which led to many injuries and deaths. Unfortunately, during the production of the Pinto, there was no National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, (NHTSA) rear- end impact testing on new vehicles. It was not until 1976 that the NHTSA Standard 301 related to rear impact went into effect, (Birsch, 1994). Although Ford had access to a new design which would reduce the potential of the Ford Pinto from exploding, the company chose not to implement the design, which would have resulted in less deaths and injuries. Discussed will be the solution if involved in this ethical dilemma, the external social
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 4

MGT 216 LTA Pinto paper - The Ford Pinto Case 1 The Ford...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online