HW7 - MATH 185 SOLUTIONS OF HW VII (1) (41.5)(30pts) By...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: MATH 185 SOLUTIONS OF HW VII (1) (41.5)(30pts) By triangle inequality, Logz z 2 | ln R | + | i | R 2 < ln R + R 2 since z = ln R + i where z = Re i and- < < . (N.B. | ln R | = ln R since R > 1.) Hence, Z C R Logz z 2 dz Z C R Logz z 2 dz < 2 R ln R + R 2 = 2 ln R + R Moreover, lim R 2 (ln R + ) R = lim R 2 (1 /R ) 1 = 0 by LHospitals rule, we can conclude that lim R Z C R Logz z 2 dz = 0 NOTICE. If you finish to solve the problem, you need to check WHAT YOU HAVE PROVEN. Even though you write the same sentence appear- ing the problem, it is important because it can clarify your assertion. (2) (43. 5)(30pts) First we may replace the branch- < < by- / 2 < < 3 / 2 since- 1 is not defined in Logz and change of the branch cut does not affect to the result in this situation. So, we can use the antiderivative z 1+ i 1+ i of z i ....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/01/2010 for the course MATH 185 taught by Professor Lim during the Fall '07 term at University of California, Berkeley.

Page1 / 2

HW7 - MATH 185 SOLUTIONS OF HW VII (1) (41.5)(30pts) By...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online