TEAM PROJECT RUBRIC
.
criteria
(C, 70-79%%)
(B, 80-89%)
(A, 90-100%)
Knowledge &
Understanding
Use of credible
sources as a
basis for
existing
knowledge.
Information is general. Lacks
detail. Minimum of stats and
facts. Lacks explanation.
Sources are either missing or
from questionable websites.
Information meets minimum
standards. A few details
outlined. .
Credible sources orally cited.
Information and detailed
explanations thoroughly
describe the topic.
.
Critical Thinking
Evidence of
looking at a
complex topic
through
different
perspectives
No evidence of different
perspectives. No explanations.
Meets standard by referencing
different perspectives.
Minimum of explanation,
detail.
Use of the SPERM model
evident. Different
perspectives discussed in
detail.
Communication
Topic is
supported
appropriate
video,
PowerPoint or
other methods
with emphasis
on the
presenter’s oral
Presentation more than 5
minutes short of assignment
prompt. No use of supportive
visuals. Read slides exclusively
with no comments.
Meets minimum standards.
Mostly read slides with no
extemporaneous comments
Presenter(s) used visuals to
support their topic and
presented extemporaneously
at least 50% of the time.

extemporaneou
s presentation

Assessment, Evaluation & Reporting
Level/Grade
Additional
Info.
R (below 50%)
D – Level 1
(50-59%)
C - Level 2
(60-69%)
B - Level 3
(70-79%)
A - Level 4
(80-100%)
Report Card
Description
insufficient
achievement of
curriculum
expectations
additional
learning is
required before
the student will
begin to achieve
success with this
grade's
expectations
.
limited level of
achievement
achievement falls
below
the provincial
standard
.
moderate level of
achievement
achievement
is
below, but is
approaching
the
provincial standard
.


You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 6 pages?
- Fall '19
- Logic