Fitness vs. Fatness

Fitness vs. Fatness - Caloric Restriction with or without...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Caloric Restriction with or without Exercise: The Fitness vs. Fatness Debate D. Enette Larson-Meyer 1,2 , Leanne Redman 1 , Leonie K. Heilbronn 3 , Corby K Martin 1 , Eric Ravussin 1 , and The Pennington CALERIE Team 1 1 Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 2 University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 3 Garvan Institute, Sydney, Australia Abstract There is debate over the independent effects of aerobic fitness and body fatness on mortality and disease risks. PURPOSE To determine whether a 25% energy deficit that produces equal change in body fatness leads to greater cardiometabolic benefits when aerobic exercise is included. METHODS Thirty-six overweight participants (16 males/20 females) 391 y; 822kg; BMI=27.8 0.3 Kg/m 2 , meanSEM) were randomized to one of three groups (N=12 for each) for a 6-month intervention: control (CO: weight-maintenance diet), caloric restriction (CR: 25% reduction in energy intake) or caloric restriction plus aerobic exercise (CR+EX: 12.5% reduction in energy intake plus 12.5% increase in exercise energy expenditure). Food was provided during weeks 112 and 22 24. Changes in fat mass, visceral fat, VO 2peak (graded treadmill test), muscular strength (isokinetic knee extension/flexion), blood lipids, blood pressure and insulin sensitivity/secretion were compared. RESULTS As expected, VO 2peak was significantly improved after 6 months of intervention in CR +EX only (225% vs. 75% in CR and 53% in CO) whereas isokinetic muscular strength did not change. There was no difference in the losses of weight, fat mass or visceral fat and changes in systolic BP between the intervention groups. However, only CR+EX had a significant decrease in diastolic BP ( 53% vs. 22% in CR and 12% in CO), in LDL-cholesterol ( 134% vs. 63% in CR and 24% in CO), and a significant increase in insulin sensitivity (6622% vs. 4020% in CR and 111% in CO). CONCLUSIONS Despite similar effect on fat losses, combining CR with exercise increased aerobic fitness in parallel with improved insulin sensitivity, LDL-cholesterol and diastolic BP. The results lend support for inclusion of an exercise component in weight loss programs to improve metabolic fitness. Key Terms exercise training; maximal aerobic fitness; energy restriction; blood pressure; blood lipids Address Correspondence and Reprint Requests to: D. Enette Larson-Meyer, Ph.D., R.D, FACSM. Department 3354, 1000 E University Avenue, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, Phone: 307-766-4378, FAX: 307-766-5686, enette@uwyo.edu. NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Med Sci Sports Exerc . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 January 13....
View Full Document

Page1 / 14

Fitness vs. Fatness - Caloric Restriction with or without...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online