Waters_v_Churchill_Syllabus

Waters_v_Churchill_Syllabus - Waters v. Churchill...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Waters v. Churchill (92-1450), 511 U.S. 661 (1994) Syllabus I. WATERS et al. v. CHURCHILL et al. II. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit No. 92-1450. Argued December 1, 1993 -- Decided May 31, 1994 Petitioners fired respondent Churchill from her nursing job at a public hospital, allegedly because of statements she made to co worker Perkins Graham during a work break. What Churchill actually said during the conversation is in dispute. Petitioners' version was based on interviews with Perkins Graham and one Ballew, who had overheard part of the conversation, and indicated that Churchill made disruptive statements critical of her department and of petitioners. However, in Churchill's version, which was corroborated by others who had overheard part of the conversation, her speech was largely limited to nondisruptive statements critical of the hospital's "cross training" policy, which she believed threatened patient care. Churchill sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that her speech was protected under Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 , 142, in which the Court held that the First Amendment protects a government employee's speech if it is on a matter of public concern and the employee's interest in expressing herself on this matter is not outweighed by any injury the speech could cause to the government's interest, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees. The District Court granted petitioners summary judgment, holding that management could fire Churchill with impunity because neither version of the conversation was protected under Connick . The Court of Appeals reversed, concluding that Churchill's speech, viewed in the light most favorable to her, was on a matter of public concern and was not disruptive, and that the
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/08/2010 for the course PADM 223 at San Jose State University .

Page1 / 3

Waters_v_Churchill_Syllabus - Waters v. Churchill...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online