school_age_lies - Developmental Psychology 2007, Vol. 43,...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Lying in the Elementary School Years: Verbal Deception and Its Relation to Second-Order Belief Understanding Victoria Talwar McGill University Heidi M. Gordon Simon Fraser University Kang Lee University of Toronto The development of lying to conceal one’s own transgression was examined in school-age children. Children ( N 5 172) between 6 and 11 years of age were asked not to peek at the answer to a trivia question while left alone in a room. Half of the children could not resist temptation and peeked at the answer. When the experimenter asked them whether they had peeked, the majority of children lied. However, children’s subsequent verbal statements, made in response to follow-up questioning, were not always consistent with their initial denial and, hence, leaked critical information to reveal their deceit. Children’s ability to maintain consistency between their initial lie and subsequent verbal statements increased with age. This ability is also positively correlated with children’s 2nd-order belief scores, suggesting that theory of mind understanding plays an important role in children’s ability to lie consistently. Keywords: lying, verbal deception, theory of mind, second-order belief, children Lying, in essence, is theory of mind in action. Lying refers to the act by which one deliberately makes a false statement with intent to instill false beliefs into the mind of the statement’s recipient (Lee, 2000). To lie successfully, lie-tellers must be able to have an appropriate assessment of their own and the recipients’ mental states (e.g., whether recipients are ignorant about the true state of affairs that the lie-tellers themselves have full knowledge of). Lie-tellers must then construct and produce false statements that differ from their true beliefs about the state of affairs. Further, the false statements must be carefully constructed such that they will not arouse suspicion in the recipient. This often requires lie-tellers to produce verbal and nonverbal behaviors that are consistent with the false statement but inconsistent with their true beliefs and to conceal verbal and nonverbal behaviors that are consistent with their true beliefs but incongruent with the false statement. Thus, by examining lie-telling behaviors in children, we can gain important insight about how children learn to use their theory of mind in everyday life situations for adaptive (or maladaptive) purposes. A limited number of studies, most of which have involved young children, have investigated children’s actual lie-telling be- havior (e.g., Chandler, Fritz, & Hala, 1989; Sullivan, 1989; Polak & Harris, 1999; studies have used a modified temptation resistance paradigm in which children are given the opportunity to commit a transgression (i.e., peek at a forbidden object) and have an opportunity to spontaneously lie when they are asked if they peeked. Overall,
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 7

school_age_lies - Developmental Psychology 2007, Vol. 43,...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online