case brief Krinsky v. Doe 6

case brief Krinsky v. Doe 6 - Professor Casey March 2008...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Professor Casey Bus 80 17 March 2008 Case Brief Krinsky v. Doe 6 Citation Krinsky v. Doe 6 H030767 Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 1658 LISA KRINSKY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DOE 6, Defendant and Appellant. No. H030767 In the Court of Appeal of the State of California Sixth Appellate District Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. CV059796 Facts The Plaintiff Lisa Krinsky filed a law suit against the Defendant Doe 6 and other 9 Does for posting "defamatory remarks" about other workers of SFBC International, global development drug service company, and her self. The remarks were posted on Yahoo message board. The main reason for the law suit was that; first, the remarks were posted to intentionally cause
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
problems between the plaintiff and the company SFBC, second, the remarks were false statements and it cause harm and suffering to the plaintiff. In response to this, Doe 6 took the case to superior court of California to legally object to the suit file by plaintiff. The main reason for the file by Doe 6 was that all 10 defendants have the right of free speech protected by first amendment of Constitution. Doe 6 also stated that this right cannot be taken away not even by
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 4

case brief Krinsky v. Doe 6 - Professor Casey March 2008...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online