peer response - 2/24/08 Peer-Response Dear Katie, I truly...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
2/24/08 Peer-Response Dear Katie, I truly enjoyed reading you article analysis of the article “Media, Morality, and Madness: The Case Against Sleaze TV,” by Jo Tavener. I like how you wrote your introduction fairly straight-forward allowing your readers to get the main idea of the article. It also helped comprehend the author’s tone and intended audience. I was even more engaged when you brought concern to both sides of the issue. I enjoyed reading your opinion on the issue, and I felt like you performed an exceptional job to make your case with the reasoning provided. I felt like the goal for your analysis was to summarize to your readers what the article was about, and make it clear to your readers that Tavener wrote a biased critique of the media. Furthermore, the summary helped pave the way to your own thoughts on the topic which I viewed as a main goal of your analysis. You wanted to make a point
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

peer response - 2/24/08 Peer-Response Dear Katie, I truly...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online